The Supreme Court's 6-3 unsigned order revives Alabama's VRA-blocked 2023 congressional map days before the May 19 primary, remanding under Louisiana v. Callais.
The Supreme Court cleared the way for Alabama to use its 2023 congressional map in the May 19 primary, vacating lower-court injunctions that had barred the map as a violation of the Voting Rights Act [1]. The unsigned 6-3 order, issued May 11, came with early voting already underway statewide [1]. The Court remanded to the lower courts for reconsideration in light of its April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais [2]. The practical effect: a map that multiple courts had found racially discriminatory will govern an active federal election before those courts can revisit their conclusions.
The procedural posture is layered. Lower courts had enjoined Alabama's 2023 map after finding it likely diluted Black voting strength in violation of Section 2 of the VRA, the same legal framework at issue in the earlier Allen v. Milligan litigation [1]. Alabama's Attorney General Steve Marshall sought emergency relief from the Supreme Court, asking the justices to lift those injunctions pending the remand [2]. The Court obliged, without opinion, over the dissent of Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson [1]. Justice Sotomayor, writing for the three dissenters, argued the order injects confusion into an ongoing election at the worst possible moment [1].
The substantive stakes extend well beyond Alabama's borders. Louisiana v. Callais, the decision driving this remand, altered how courts are to analyze racial predominance and partisan justification in redistricting challenges [3]. By vacating the Alabama injunctions immediately and directing reconsideration under that new framework, the Court signals that lower courts applying the prior VRA standard may have gone too far [3]. Civil rights groups including the Legal Defense Fund, which has litigated the Alabama redistricting saga across multiple election cycles, warned that the order accelerates the erosion of majority-minority districts across Southern states heading into the 2026 midterms [3].
The May 19 primary will proceed under the 2023 map regardless of any subsequent lower-court action [2]. On remand, the district court must re-examine the injunction under the Callais framework, a process unlikely to resolve before general election candidate filings [1]. Advocacy organizations have signaled they will press for expedited proceedings [3]. Whether any revised ruling could alter district lines before November remains an open and rapidly narrowing question.
—