Israel-Lebanon Peace Talks Stall Over Hezbollah Disarmament Sequencing

Israel and Lebanon concluded the third round of U.S.-brokered direct negotiations at the State Department on May 14 and 15, with a senior State Department official characterizing the eight-hour first session as "productive and positive," but substantive gaps over Hezbollah's disarmament remain unresolved ^[1][2]. The talks, the highest-level direct engagement between the two countries in decades, produced no breakthrough on the central sticking point: which obligation comes first, a halt to Israeli military operations or the disarmament of Hezbollah ^[3][4]. The ceasefire governing the current cessation of hostilities, initially a 10-day truce announced April 16 and then extended for three weeks by President Donald Trump on April 23, was set to expire Sunday ^[5][6]. Following the conclusion of the third round, the parties agreed to extend the cessation of hostilities by an additional 45 days ^[7].

The delegations arriving in Washington represented a structural escalation from the two prior ambassador-level sessions held April 14 and April 23. For the first time, military representatives joined the talks on both sides ^[8]. The Israeli delegation was led by Ambassador Yechiel Leiter and included IDF Head of Strategy Brig. Gen. Amichai Levin and the acting Israeli military attaché in Washington ^[9]. The Lebanese side was led by former Ambassador Simon Karam, an attorney and well-connected former Lebanese envoy to Washington, alongside current Ambassador Nada Hamadeh Mouawad and Lebanon's military attaché ^[10][11]. The U.S. mediation team comprised Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, Secretary of State Marco Rubio's adviser Michael Needham, and Ambassador to Lebanon Michael Issa. Secretary Rubio, who attended the first round in April, did not participate in the May sessions, as he was traveling with President Trump ^[12][13].

The core impasse is one of sequencing. Israel has conditioned further progress on the disarmament of Hezbollah, treating it as a prerequisite to any withdrawal from Lebanese territory it currently holds ^[4][14]. Lebanon has taken the inverse position: it wants a ceasefire that Israel fully implements before moving to any other discussion ^[15]. A senior Lebanese official told reporters that the Lebanese delegation entered the third round with a single document, centered on a ceasefire demand ^[15]. Lebanese officials have also specified that they seek a security agreement or armistice stopping short of full diplomatic normalization, a position that diverges sharply from Israel's framing of the talks as a precursor to normalized relations, including borders, embassies, and open trade ^[4][16]. Ambassador Leiter stated publicly that any such peace treaty would be "conditioned on the success of the second track, dismantling Hezbollah" [POLITICO]^[16].

The sequencing dispute is compounded by active hostilities that continued through the talks. On May 13, Israeli strikes on multiple vehicles in southern Lebanon killed 12 people, including a woman and two children, according to Lebanon's Health Ministry ^[17]. A Hezbollah drone exploded inside Israel on the opening day of the third round, injuring three civilians, including two severely, according to the Israeli military and hospitals, the first confirmed instance of Hezbollah-caused civilian casualties from projectiles since the April ceasefire ^[17]. Israel also maintains a forward defensive buffer zone in southern Lebanese territory and has continued demolishing villages within that belt ^[18]. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, who has faced domestic political pressure from Hezbollah and aligned members of parliament for engaging in direct talks with Israel, has also resisted U.S. calls to meet personally with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stating such a meeting would be appropriate only after a security agreement is in place and Israeli strikes have stopped ^[19][4].

The broader framework the U.S. has pursued calls for a comprehensive peace and security agreement addressing border demarcation, humanitarian relief, reconstruction, Lebanese sovereignty, and the full disarmament of Hezbollah, with the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) serving as the instrument of that disarmament ^[20]. The State Department has publicly stated that comprehensive peace depends on restoring Lebanese state authority and fully disarming Hezbollah ^[20]. The U.S. is the largest historical donor to the LAF, having provided more than $3 billion in assistance from 2006 through early 2025 ^[21]. At a Senate hearing coinciding with the talks, CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper stated that the U.S. could commit necessary funding to enable Lebanon to do more on Hezbollah disarmament, per reporting by POLITICO [POLITICO]. The resource question is central to Lebanon's position: Beirut has argued it lacks both the financial capacity and the political authority to assert state control over Hezbollah's arsenal without robust international backing ^[21][22]. Following the conclusion of the third round, the parties agreed to split subsequent negotiations into separate political and security tracks, with a political track scheduled for June 2 and 3 and a security track to convene at the Pentagon on May 29 ^[23].

Iran's influence looms over the talks on multiple dimensions. Hezbollah is not a formal party to the negotiations and has openly opposed Lebanon's direct engagement with Israel ^[24]. Hezbollah's political council has stated it will not abide by any agreements reached through the direct talks ^[24]. Separately, Iran has attempted to link its own ceasefire negotiations with the U.S. to Lebanon, insisting the Iran-U.S. truce cover Hezbollah as well, an effort Washington has resisted ^[25]. The State Department has used the Washington talks to decouple the Lebanon file from the Iran track ^[25]. The November 2024 ceasefire, brokered by the U.S. and France following Israel's military campaign that significantly degraded Hezbollah's leadership and arsenal, included obligations on Hezbollah disarmament that the group has resisted fulfilling, and reports indicate Hezbollah has been rebuilding its military capabilities since that agreement ^[26][27].

—