An 18-year-old Florida woman filed an 11-page civil complaint in Miami against social media influencer Braden Eric Peters, known online as "Clavicular," alleging he served her alcohol, engaged in nonconsensual sex with her, and injected her cheeks with a fat-dissolving compound he allegedly mixed with methamphetamine, with the encounter conducted during a livestreaming session [1]. The plaintiff, Aleksandra Mendoza, also alleges Peters leveraged his audience of more than 1 million followers to interfere with her sponsorship agreements, causing economic harm [1]. Peters' attorney denied the allegations [1].
Peters operates in the "looksmaxxing" subculture, a loosely organized online community centered on physical self-improvement techniques, some of which involve unregulated or experimental compounds. The complaint's allegation that Peters injected Mendoza with a substance containing methamphetamine implicates potential violations under Florida's battery statute, drug-delivery laws, and, depending on the compound used, federal controlled-substances provisions. The allegation that he administered a cosmetic injectable, a procedure limited to licensed medical professionals under Florida law, adds a separate layer of potential unlicensed-practice liability. The civil filing does not preclude parallel criminal referral.
The lawsuit was filed in Miami and names Peters as the sole defendant [1]. The streaming platform Kick, on which Peters has broadcast content, is identified in the discovery record as a key organization but does not appear as a named defendant in the complaint as reported [1]. The complaint's economic-harm count, tied to Peters' alleged use of his platform to disparage Mendoza to sponsors, points toward tortious interference and defamation theories that extend the case beyond the physical-assault allegations. Peters' counsel's denial places the factual record in direct dispute, setting up contested proceedings on liability and damages.
No criminal charges have been publicly reported as of the filing date. If Florida authorities open a parallel investigation, the civil proceeding could be stayed pending its resolution, or civil discovery could run concurrently and create evidentiary complications for both sides. Mendoza's counsel will likely seek early preservation orders covering Peters' livestream archives and any communications with the streaming platform. The case's trajectory, and whether Kick faces third-party subpoenas or eventual joinder, will depend on what those records show about the platform's knowledge of the alleged conduct.