Skip to content

States Secure Antitrust Verdict Against Live Nation; Breakup Looms

A federal jury found Live Nation and Ticketmaster liable for unlawful monopoly maintenance; 33 states rejected the DOJ's $280M settlement and won at trial.

APR 15, 2026 · NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK, UNITED STATES · UNITED STATES ET AL. V. LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT / TICKETMASTER

A federal jury in Manhattan returned a verdict against Live Nation Entertainment and its Ticketmaster subsidiary on April 15, finding that the companies unlawfully maintained monopoly power in live-event ticketing and venue promotion [1]. The jury awarded $1.72 per primary ticket sold under the states' antitrust claims [1]. The verdict sets the stage for a remedies phase in which a coalition of states is seeking structural relief, including a potential court-ordered breakup of the company [2].

The case, United States et al. v. Live Nation Entertainment / Ticketmaster, was tried over five weeks before Judge Arun Subramanian in the Southern District of New York [1]. The Department of Justice and six states reached a $280 million settlement early in the proceedings, but 33 states and the District of Columbia rejected that deal as insufficient and continued to press their claims at trial [1]. New York Attorney General Letitia James led the state coalition [1]. DOJ Antitrust Division officials, including Acting Assistant Attorney General Omeed Assefi, were parties to the earlier settlement [1].

The verdict is a significant development in state enforcement of federal antitrust law. By declining the DOJ settlement and securing a jury finding of monopoly liability independently, the state coalition demonstrated that state attorneys general can carry a major structural antitrust case to verdict without federal co-prosecution [1]. The outcome challenges the conventional assumption that the DOJ sets the ceiling for antitrust enforcement in industries where it has already negotiated a resolution [2]. Live Nation, led by Chief Executive Michael Rapino, controls a vertically integrated chain spanning venue ownership, artist management, promotion, and primary ticketing through Ticketmaster, a structure that sat at the center of the states' liability theory [2].

The remedies phase now before Judge Subramanian will determine what relief, if any, the court imposes on Live Nation's corporate structure [1]. States are pressing for divestiture, which could include spinning off Ticketmaster or divesting Live Nation's venue holdings [2]. The company is expected to contest any structural remedy vigorously, and briefing schedules for the remedies phase have not yet been publicly reported. A ruling on remedies would follow additional submissions and, likely, further hearings. An appeal by Live Nation to the Second Circuit is anticipated regardless of the remedies outcome [2].

References

[1]NY Attorney General. (2026, April 15). Attorney General James and Coalition of States Win Trial Against Live Nation and Ticketmaster. https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2026/attorney-general-james-and-coalition-states-win-trial-against-live-nation-and
[2]Time. (2026, April 16). How Live Nation Verdict May Affect Ticket Prices. https://time.com/article/2026/04/16/live-nation-federal-antitrust-verdict-explainer/

Latest Articles

Back To Top
Search
⚡ Cached with atec Page Cache