The Supreme Court has four major Trump administration cases still undecided, covering birthright citizenship, FTC and Fed firings, and TPS, all due by late June.
With the Supreme Court's term approaching its traditional late-June close, four consequential cases involving the Trump administration remain undecided, each carrying the potential to redraw fundamental constitutional boundaries governing citizenship, presidential power, and the independence of federal regulatory agencies [1].
The pending cases are Trump v. Barbara, a direct challenge to President Trump's executive order curtailing birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment; Trump v. Slaughter, which tests whether the president may remove Federal Trade Commission commissioners without cause; Trump v. Cook, raising the parallel question of executive authority to dismiss Federal Reserve governors; and a consolidated matter involving Temporary Protected Status designations for Haitian and Syrian nationals, which implicates the Department of Homeland Security's discretionary authority [1][2]. Solicitor General D. John Sauer has argued the administration's position across these disputes before the Court [1].
The oral argument record in Trump v. Barbara, heard April 1, supplied the most visible signal of the Court's direction. A majority of justices appeared skeptical of the administration's construction of the Citizenship Clause, and legal observers have interpreted the argument dynamics as strongly favoring a ruling against the government, with projections suggesting a lopsided margin [3]. The independent-agency removal cases present a starker doctrinal contest. Should the Court rule for the administration in Trump v. Slaughter and Trump v. Cook, it would effectively unwind the statutory protections that insulate commissioners and governors from at-will presidential dismissal, a result that would reach well beyond the FTC and the Federal Reserve to threaten the structural design of independent agencies across the executive branch [1][2].
The stakes extend beyond any single administration. A ruling expanding presidential removal power would accelerate the ongoing consolidation of executive control over the regulatory state, while a decision narrowing birthright citizenship would mark the first judicial contraction of that right since the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified [1][2]. Both outcomes would rank among the most consequential the Court has produced in decades on questions of administrative and constitutional law.
Decisions are expected before the Court rises for its summer recess, with late June the conventional deadline [1][2]. No argument dates or additional briefing are pending; the cases are fully submitted and awaiting the justices' votes.
—