German Chancellor Friedrich Merz publicly accused the Trump administration on April 27 of entering the Iran war without a viable exit strategy and of being outmaneuvered by Tehran at the negotiating table, marking his sharpest departure yet from the political support he extended to Washington when Operation Epic Fury began on Feb. 28. The remarks, delivered to students in Marsberg in Germany's North Rhine-Westphalia region, drew an immediate rebuttal from President Donald Trump and raised new questions about allied cohesion as ceasefire talks with Iran remain deadlocked. [1][2]
U.S. and Israeli forces launched joint strikes on Iran on Feb. 28, conducting nearly 900 strikes in the first 12 hours of what the United States designated Operation Epic Fury. The strikes targeted Iranian military and government sites and killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei; they were launched while negotiations between Iran and the United States over Iran's nuclear program were still ongoing. [3][4] The administration submitted a new notification to Congress under the War Powers Resolution and an Article 51 letter to the UN Security Council after operations resumed on Feb. 28. [5] After more than five weeks of fighting, the U.S. and Iran agreed to a ceasefire on April 7-8 that included Israel, but the conflict then shifted to a standoff over restricted access to the Strait of Hormuz. [6]
On March 3, four days into the war, Merz traveled to Washington for a bilateral meeting with Trump, where he stated that Germany was "supporting the United States and Israel to get rid of this terrible terrorist regime." [7] His April 27 comments represented a marked reversal. Speaking at the Marsberg school visit, Merz said, "The Iranians are clearly stronger than expected, and the Americans clearly have no truly convincing strategy in the negotiations either." [1][2] He criticized the United States for entering the Iran war without any strategy, arguing that this also makes it harder to end the conflict, and that "it's not just about getting in; you also have to get out." [8] He cited the U.S. experience in Afghanistan and Iraq as cautionary precedents. [8]
The specific trigger for Merz's remarks was the collapse of a planned negotiating session in Pakistan. Trump had touted a meeting between U.S. and Iranian officials in Islamabad but blocked his top envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, from flying to Pakistan after Iranian officials made clear they would not participate in negotiations. [9] Merz characterized Iranian tactics as being "very skillful at not negotiating, letting the Americans travel to Islamabad and then leave again without any result." [2] Iran had separately proposed reopening the Strait of Hormuz and ending the war while postponing negotiations on its nuclear program, a proposal that would not require Tehran to make concessions on its highly enriched uranium stockpile. [10] White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump had discussed the Iranian proposal with national security aides and that the U.S. wanted to ensure freedom of navigation through the strait and remove Iran's highly enriched uranium. [10]
Trump responded to Merz's comments on Tuesday via Truth Social, writing that Merz "thinks it's OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon," that the chancellor "doesn't know what he's talking about," and that "if Iran had a Nuclear Weapon, the whole World would be held hostage." [11] The exchange has since escalated: Trump warned he may pull troops from Germany, stating that "the United States is studying and reviewing the possible reduction of troops in Germany, with a determination to be made over the next short period of time." [12] The White House had previously declined to engage substantively on the status of talks with Iran, with spokesperson Olivia Wales stating, "These are sensitive diplomatic discussions and the U.S. will not negotiate through the press." [9]
Merz's criticism lands within a broader pattern of European frustration with the conflict. Major European powers have largely rejected President Trump's demand for naval intervention, with Germany, Italy, and Greece explicitly refusing to join military operations in the Strait of Hormuz; Germany's defense minister said, "this is not our war." [13] European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the European Union has spent an extra €25 billion, nearly $29.3 billion, on energy resources since the start of the war. [14] Germany has offered to deploy minesweepers to help secure shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz, but Merz has conditioned any such contribution on a full cessation of hostilities. [1] Germany is not alone in voicing frustration: the U.K.'s top economic official recently criticized the Trump administration for entering the conflict without a "clear exit plan," citing the impact on British consumers. [12]
References:
[1] Al Jazeera. (2026, April 27). 'Clearly stronger': Germany's Merz says Iran 'humiliated' US in its war. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/27/iran-very-skilful-as-us-humiliated-says-german-chancellor
Comments (0)