Skip to content
RSS

States v. Live Nation: Federal Jury Finds Ticketmaster Monopoly on All Claims

A federal jury in Manhattan returned a verdict for all plaintiff states on April 15, 2026, finding that Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiary Ticketmaster LLC violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act through unlawful monopolization, violated Section 1 through tying, and separately violated the antitrust and unfair-competition laws of each plaintiff state [1][2]. The complaint, filed in the Southern District of New York in May 2024 by the Department of Justice, 39 state attorneys general, and the District of Columbia, alleged that Live Nation controlled virtually every layer of the live-music ecosystem, from venue ownership and concert promotion to primary ticketing, enabling it to suppress competition and raise costs for fans, artists, and venues [3][4].

The trial opened March 2, 2026, before Judge Arun Subramanian [5]. During the second week, the DOJ and Live Nation reached a mid-trial settlement that included a $280 million fund for participating states but did not require a Ticketmaster divestiture [6]. Six states accepted those terms; the remaining 33 states and the District of Columbia rejected the settlement as inadequate and continued to try the case with outside counsel [7][8]. After approximately five to six weeks of testimony, including hours on the stand from Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino, who denied anticompetitive conduct throughout, and four days of deliberations, the jury returned a clean sweep for the states on every claim [9][10]. The jury found that Live Nation unlawfully monopolized primary concert ticketing services at major concert venues, unlawfully monopolized the large-amphitheater market, and unlawfully tied artist-promotion services to artists' use of those amphitheaters [11]. The jury also found that the defendants' unlawful conduct harmed competition in all 34 jurisdictions, and that Ticketmaster overcharged consumers by $1.72 per ticket with respect to its primary-ticketing monopolization [12].

Damages have not yet been fixed. The verdict form established the $1.72 per-ticket overcharge figure, but the quantum of any monetary award, trebling under the Sherman Act, civil penalties, and the scope of structural or injunctive relief, including a possible forced divestiture of Ticketmaster, will be resolved in a separate bench proceeding before Judge Subramanian [13][14]. Live Nation stated post-verdict that it had already accrued $280 million toward state damages and civil-penalty claims in connection with the DOJ settlement [15].

Live Nation moved swiftly to limit the verdict's reach. The company filed a letter request for expedited relief to strike the plaintiffs' damages expert and the jury findings premised on her analysis, arguing that without her testimony the states had no basis for a damages claim [16]. Judge Subramanian rejected that bid for expedited relief on April 21, 2026, directing the parties to submit a briefing schedule instead [16]. Live Nation also announced its intent to renew a motion for judgment as a matter of law, seeking to overturn the liability verdict on the grounds that the states failed to prove the alleged antitrust markets, monopoly power, anticompetitive effects, and antitrust injury [17]. In parallel, attorneys for a certified class action in the Central District of California have indicated they may seek to invoke collateral estoppel based on the states' verdict, a prospect that gives Live Nation additional incentive to contest the SDNY judgment aggressively through post-trial motions and on appeal [18].

References

[1]Paul, Weiss. (2026, April 15). Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Verdict: Key Takeaways from the States' Jury Trial Win. https://www.paulweiss.com/insights/client-memos/live-nationticketmaster-antitrust-verdict-key-takeaways-from-the-states-jury-trial-win
[2]Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General. (2026, April 15). VERDICT: AG Sunday Announces Federal Jury Finds Live Nation/Ticketmaster Operated Monopoly Over Live Entertainment Industry. https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/verdict-ag-sunday-announces-federal-jury-finds-live-nation-ticketmaster-operated-monopoly-over-live-entertainment-industry/
[3]NPR. (2026, April 15). Jury finds that Live Nation and Ticketmaster acted as a monopoly. https://www.npr.org/2026/04/15/nx-s1-5786715/live-nation-ticketmaster-antitrust-verdict-monopoly
[4]CNN. (2026, April 15). Jury finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster operated as a monopoly and overcharged fans. https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/15/politics/ticketmaster-live-nation-monopoly-verdict
[5]Wikipedia. (2026, April 15). United States v. Live Nation Entertainment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Live_Nation_Entertainment
[6]Paul, Weiss. (2026, April 15). Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Verdict: Key Takeaways from the States' Jury Trial Win. https://www.paulweiss.com/insights/client-memos/live-nationticketmaster-antitrust-verdict-key-takeaways-from-the-states-jury-trial-win
[7]Paul, Weiss. (2026, April 15). Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Verdict: Key Takeaways from the States' Jury Trial Win. https://www.paulweiss.com/insights/client-memos/live-nationticketmaster-antitrust-verdict-key-takeaways-from-the-states-jury-trial-win
[8]NPR. (2026, April 15). Jury finds that Live Nation and Ticketmaster acted as a monopoly. https://www.npr.org/2026/04/15/nx-s1-5786715/live-nation-ticketmaster-antitrust-verdict-monopoly
[9]NPR. (2026, April 15). Jury finds that Live Nation and Ticketmaster acted as a monopoly. https://www.npr.org/2026/04/15/nx-s1-5786715/live-nation-ticketmaster-antitrust-verdict-monopoly
[10]Paul, Weiss. (2026, April 15). Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Verdict: Key Takeaways from the States' Jury Trial Win. https://www.paulweiss.com/insights/client-memos/live-nationticketmaster-antitrust-verdict-key-takeaways-from-the-states-jury-trial-win
[11]Paul, Weiss. (2026, April 15). Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Verdict: Key Takeaways from the States' Jury Trial Win. https://www.paulweiss.com/insights/client-memos/live-nationticketmaster-antitrust-verdict-key-takeaways-from-the-states-jury-trial-win
[12]Paul, Weiss. (2026, April 15). Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Verdict: Key Takeaways from the States' Jury Trial Win. https://www.paulweiss.com/insights/client-memos/live-nationticketmaster-antitrust-verdict-key-takeaways-from-the-states-jury-trial-win
[13]CNN. (2026, April 15). Jury finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster operated as a monopoly and overcharged fans. https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/15/politics/ticketmaster-live-nation-monopoly-verdict
[14]Wikipedia. (2026, April 15). United States v. Live Nation Entertainment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Live_Nation_Entertainment
[15]CNN. (2026, April 15). Jury finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster operated as a monopoly and overcharged fans. https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/15/politics/ticketmaster-live-nation-monopoly-verdict
[16]Thompson Coburn LLP. (2026, April 28). Live Nation and Ticketmaster Found Liable for Antitrust Violations by Federal Jury. https://www.thompsoncoburn.com/insights/live-nation-and-ticketmaster-found-liable-for-antitrust-violations-by-federal-jury/ [

Latest Articles

Discussion

Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top
Search